Comprehensive documentation covering: - Actual production primitives (37 primitives across 5 domains) - O: TASTE, CRAFT, FRESHNESS, TEMPERATURE, EFFECTIVENESS, ACCURACY, CONDITION, CONSISTENCY - P: MANNER, COMPETENCE, ATTENTIVENESS, COMMUNICATION - J: SPEED, FRICTION, RELIABILITY, AVAILABILITY - E: CLEANLINESS, COMFORT, SAFETY, AMBIANCE, ACCESSIBILITY, DIGITAL_UX - V: PRICE_LEVEL, PRICE_FAIRNESS, PRICE_TRANSPARENCY, VALUE_FOR_MONEY - meta: HONESTY, ETHICS, PROMISES, etc. + UNMAPPED, NON_INFORMATIVE - Classification pipeline with config resolution - Non-informative detection (skip LLM for junk content) - Language detection and per-language UNMAPPED tracking - Database schema for detected_spans_v2 - Evaluation tooling and quality metrics Note: A larger taxonomy (~150 primitives) exists in gbp_primitive_prompts.py for future expansion. The production system uses the subset above. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
19 KiB
Classification System & Primitives Taxonomy
Version: 2.0
Status: Production
Location: packages/reviewiq-pipeline/scripts/run_classification_v2.py
Overview
The Classification System transforms raw customer reviews into structured, actionable data by:
- Extracting spans - Identifying semantically meaningful segments within review text
- Classifying primitives - Mapping each span to a primitive (e.g.,
MANNER,SPEED,VALUE_FOR_MONEY) - Scoring - Assigning valence, intensity, detail, and confidence to each span
- Filtering - Detecting non-informative content (emoji-only, translation artifacts)
The output is stored in pipeline.detected_spans_v2 and powers downstream analytics, issue routing, and the Reputation Report.
Note: There is a legacy system (
stage2_classify.py) that uses URT codes (J1.01,O1.01). The current production system uses primitives with descriptive names.
Quick Start
# Classify reviews for a business (dry run)
python scripts/run_classification_v2.py --business "Go Karts Mar Menor" --limit 100 --dry-run
# Real LLM classification
python scripts/run_classification_v2.py --business "Go Karts Mar Menor" --limit 100 --use-llm
# Evaluate classification quality
python scripts/run_classification_v2.py --evaluate "Go Karts Mar Menor"
# Language analysis across all data
python scripts/run_classification_v2.py --language-analysis
Primitives Taxonomy
The production system uses 37 primitives across 5 domains plus meta primitives. These are defined in reputation_report.py's DOMAIN_MAP.
Note: A larger taxonomy of ~150 primitives exists in
gbp_primitive_prompts.pyfor future expansion and business-specific configuration. The production system currently uses the subset below.
Domain Structure
| Domain | Code | Primitives |
|---|---|---|
| Output | O | TASTE, CRAFT, FRESHNESS, TEMPERATURE, EFFECTIVENESS, ACCURACY, CONDITION, CONSISTENCY |
| People | P | MANNER, COMPETENCE, ATTENTIVENESS, COMMUNICATION |
| Journey | J | SPEED, FRICTION, RELIABILITY, AVAILABILITY |
| Environment | E | CLEANLINESS, COMFORT, SAFETY, AMBIANCE, ACCESSIBILITY, DIGITAL_UX |
| Value | V | PRICE_LEVEL, PRICE_FAIRNESS, PRICE_TRANSPARENCY, VALUE_FOR_MONEY |
| Meta | meta | HONESTY, ETHICS, PROMISES, ACKNOWLEDGMENT, RESPONSE_QUALITY, RECOVERY, RETURN_INTENT, RECOMMEND, RECOGNITION, UNMAPPED, NON_INFORMATIVE |
Special Primitives
| Primitive | Purpose |
|---|---|
UNMAPPED |
Could not classify to any primitive (target: <10%) |
NON_INFORMATIVE |
No actionable content (emoji-only, translation artifacts) |
Full Primitive Reference
OUTPUT (O) - Product/Service Quality
| Primitive | Description | Example Signals |
|---|---|---|
TASTE |
Flavor quality (food/beverage) | "delicious", "bland", "amazing flavor" |
CRAFT |
Skill of execution | "expertly made", "sloppy work", "quality craftsmanship" |
FRESHNESS |
How fresh/new the product is | "fresh ingredients", "stale", "just made" |
TEMPERATURE |
Serving temperature | "served hot", "cold food", "perfect temperature" |
EFFECTIVENESS |
Does it work/achieve purpose | "works great", "didn't work", "effective" |
ACCURACY |
Correct execution of order | "exactly as ordered", "wrong order", "got it right" |
CONDITION |
State at delivery | "arrived perfect", "damaged", "pristine condition" |
CONSISTENCY |
Same quality each time | "always consistent", "hit or miss", "reliable quality" |
PEOPLE (P) - Staff Interactions
| Primitive | Description | Example Signals |
|---|---|---|
MANNER |
Friendliness and warmth | "so friendly", "rude", "welcoming" |
COMPETENCE |
Knowledge and skill | "very knowledgeable", "clueless", "professional" |
ATTENTIVENESS |
Being present and responsive | "attentive staff", "ignored us", "checked on us" |
COMMUNICATION |
Clarity and updates | "kept us informed", "no updates", "explained clearly" |
JOURNEY (J) - Process and Timing
| Primitive | Description | Example Signals |
|---|---|---|
SPEED |
How fast things happen | "quick service", "took forever", "fast" |
FRICTION |
Ease of process | "smooth process", "complicated", "hassle-free" |
RELIABILITY |
Dependable service | "always reliable", "unreliable", "consistent" |
AVAILABILITY |
Access to service/staff | "always available", "never open", "hard to reach" |
ENVIRONMENT (E) - Physical/Digital Space
| Primitive | Description | Example Signals |
|---|---|---|
CLEANLINESS |
Hygiene and tidiness | "spotless", "dirty", "very clean" |
COMFORT |
Physical ease | "comfortable", "cramped", "cozy seating" |
SAFETY |
Physical safety | "felt safe", "dangerous", "secure" |
AMBIANCE |
Overall mood/atmosphere | "great vibe", "loud", "nice atmosphere" |
ACCESSIBILITY |
Ease of access (physical/digital) | "wheelchair accessible", "hard to find", "easy to navigate" |
DIGITAL_UX |
Digital experience | "easy to use app", "website broken", "smooth online booking" |
VALUE (V) - Cost and Worth
| Primitive | Description | Example Signals |
|---|---|---|
PRICE_LEVEL |
Absolute cost | "affordable", "expensive", "cheap" |
PRICE_FAIRNESS |
Fair for what you get | "fair price", "overpriced", "worth every penny" |
PRICE_TRANSPARENCY |
Clear about costs | "no hidden fees", "surprise charges", "upfront pricing" |
VALUE_FOR_MONEY |
Overall value assessment | "great value", "not worth it", "bang for buck" |
META - Trust and Sentiment
| Primitive | Description | Example Signals |
|---|---|---|
HONESTY |
Truthfulness | "honest", "lied to us", "transparent" |
ETHICS |
Moral conduct | "ethical", "scam", "trustworthy" |
PROMISES |
Keeping commitments | "kept their word", "broke promises", "reliable" |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
Recognizing issues | "admitted mistake", "denied problem", "apologized" |
RESPONSE_QUALITY |
How business responds | "great response", "ignored complaint", "resolved quickly" |
RECOVERY |
Making amends | "made it right", "no compensation", "fixed the issue" |
RETURN_INTENT |
Would come back | "will be back", "never again", "definitely returning" |
RECOMMEND |
Would suggest to others | "highly recommend", "don't go", "tell your friends" |
RECOGNITION |
Customer acknowledgment | "remembered us", "treated like strangers", "knew our name" |
Span Classification
What is a Span?
A span is a contiguous segment of review text that expresses a single semantic unit about the customer experience.
Review: "The food was delicious but we waited 45 minutes for a table."
Span 1: "The food was delicious"
→ Primitive: TASTE (O)
→ Valence: + (positive)
→ Intensity: 2 (moderate)
Span 2: "we waited 45 minutes for a table"
→ Primitive: SPEED (J)
→ Valence: - (negative)
→ Intensity: 3 (high - specific number)
Span Fields
interface ClassificationSpan {
// Position
text: string; // Extracted text from review
start: number; // Character offset start
end: number; // Character offset end
// Classification
primitive: string; // e.g., "MANNER", "SPEED", "VALUE_FOR_MONEY", "UNMAPPED"
valence: "+" | "-" | "0" | "±";
intensity: 1 | 2 | 3; // 1=low, 2=moderate, 3=high
detail: 1 | 2 | 3; // 1=vague, 2=some detail, 3=specific
confidence: number; // 0.0 - 1.0
// Entity extraction (optional)
entity?: string; // Named entity (e.g., "John", "Room 302")
entity_type?: "staff" | "location" | "product" | "process" | "time";
// For UNMAPPED spans
unmapped_keywords?: string[]; // Keywords that couldn't be mapped
}
Valence Types
| Code | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
+ |
Positive sentiment | "excellent service" |
- |
Negative sentiment | "terrible wait" |
0 |
Neutral/factual | "open until 9pm" |
± |
Mixed sentiment | "good but expensive" |
Intensity Levels
| Value | Level | Signals |
|---|---|---|
1 |
Low | Generic mentions, implied sentiment |
2 |
Medium | Clear opinion, adjectives |
3 |
High | Strong language, specifics, numbers |
Detail Levels
| Value | Level | Description |
|---|---|---|
1 |
Vague | General statement, no specifics |
2 |
Some detail | Has some context or explanation |
3 |
Specific | Actionable detail, names, numbers |
Confidence
A float from 0.0 to 1.0 indicating how confident the classifier is:
≥ 0.8: High confidence, clear signal0.5 - 0.8: Medium confidence, reasonable inference< 0.5: Low confidence - if below threshold, useUNMAPPED
Classification Pipeline
Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Classification V2 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ Config Resolver│ ─→ │ LLM Classifier │ ─→ │ Store │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ • GBP path │ │ • OpenAI API │ │ • spans_v2 │ │
│ │ • Sector brief │ │ • Primitives │ │ • run_id │ │
│ │ • Enabled prims│ │ • Language det │ │ • audit │ │
│ └────────┬────────┘ └────────┬────────┘ └──────┬──────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ ┌────────────┴────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Non-Informative │ │ │
│ │ │ Detection (skip LLM) │ │ │
│ │ └─────────────────────────┘ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ pipeline.detected_spans_v2 ││
│ │ (primitive, valence, intensity, detail, confidence) ││
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Non-Informative Detection
Before calling the LLM, reviews are checked for non-informative content to save cost:
# Conservative detection - only skip when VERY sure
def is_non_informative(text: str) -> tuple[bool, str]:
"""
Returns (is_non_informative, reason).
Reasons: 'empty', 'junk_pattern', 'no_content', 'pure_repetition'
"""
Detection Rules:
- Empty text
- Emoji-only content:
^[\U0001F300-\U0001F9FF\s\.\!\?]+$ - Translation artifacts:
"translated by google" - No alphanumeric content
- Pure repetition:
"good good good good"
Reviews that pass detection go to the LLM.
Config Resolution
Each business gets a resolved config based on its GBP (Google Business Profile) category:
resolver = ConfigResolver()
config = await resolver.resolve("Go Karts Mar Menor", pool)
# Returns:
{
"business_id": "Go Karts Mar Menor",
"sector_code": "recreation",
"gbp_path": "Recreation.Amusement_Parks.Go_Karts",
"config_version": "v2.1-2026-01-15",
"enabled_primitives": ["SPEED", "SAFETY", "VALUE_FOR_MONEY", ...],
"weights": {"SAFETY": 1.5, "SPEED": 1.2, ...},
"brief": {"what_customers_judge": [...]}
}
LLM Classification Prompt
The classifier uses a structured prompt with business-specific primitives:
You are a review classifier using primitive-based analysis.
## ENABLED PRIMITIVES (use ONLY these)
- MANNER: Friendliness and warmth of staff (weight: 1.2x)
- SPEED: How fast things happen
- SAFETY: Physical safety and protection
...
## RULES
1. Extract 1-5 spans per review
2. Each span gets exactly ONE primitive
3. If nothing fits with confidence ≥ 0.5, use UNMAPPED
4. Valence: + (positive), - (negative), 0 (neutral), ± (mixed)
5. Intensity: 1 (low), 2 (moderate), 3 (high)
6. Detail: 1 (vague), 2 (some detail), 3 (specific)
## OUTPUT FORMAT (JSON)
{
"spans": [
{
"text": "exact text from review",
"primitive": "MANNER",
"valence": "+",
"intensity": 2,
"detail": 2,
"confidence": 0.85
}
]
}
Language Detection
The LLM classifier auto-detects review language and returns it with confidence. This enables:
- Per-language UNMAPPED rate tracking
- Identification of languages needing better signal coverage
- Multilingual analytics (7+ languages: Spanish, English, Dutch, German, Polish, Finnish, Danish)
Database Schema
pipeline.detected_spans_v2
CREATE TABLE pipeline.detected_spans_v2 (
id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
-- Context
job_id VARCHAR(50), -- Scraper job ID
business_id VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
review_id VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
gbp_path ltree, -- e.g., 'Recreation.Go_Karts'
sector_code VARCHAR(50), -- e.g., 'recreation'
config_version VARCHAR(100), -- Config version used
run_id UUID, -- Classification run ID
-- Classification (primitives-based)
primitive VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- e.g., "MANNER", "SPEED", "UNMAPPED"
valence VARCHAR(5) NOT NULL, -- +, -, 0, ±
intensity INTEGER, -- 1, 2, 3
detail INTEGER, -- 1, 2, 3
mode VARCHAR(50), -- e.g., "dine_in", "delivery"
confidence FLOAT NOT NULL, -- 0.0 - 1.0
-- Span position
span_text TEXT NOT NULL,
span_start INTEGER,
span_end INTEGER,
-- Entity extraction
entity VARCHAR(255),
entity_type VARCHAR(50),
unmapped_keywords TEXT[], -- Keywords for UNMAPPED spans
-- Audit trail
model VARCHAR(100), -- e.g., "gpt-4o-mini"
raw_response JSONB, -- Full LLM response
review_hash VARCHAR(32), -- For deduplication
language VARCHAR(10), -- Detected language
created_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);
-- Key indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_spans_v2_business_id ON detected_spans_v2(business_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_spans_v2_primitive ON detected_spans_v2(primitive);
CREATE INDEX idx_spans_v2_valence ON detected_spans_v2(valence);
CREATE INDEX idx_spans_v2_run_id ON detected_spans_v2(run_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_spans_v2_language ON detected_spans_v2(language);
Key Queries
Get all spans for a business in a time window:
SELECT s.*, f.review_time_utc, f.rating
FROM pipeline.detected_spans_v2 s
JOIN pipeline.review_facts_v1 f
ON f.review_id = s.review_id
AND f.business_id = s.business_id -- CRITICAL: join on both!
WHERE s.business_id = $1
AND f.review_time_utc >= $2
AND f.review_time_utc < $3
ORDER BY f.review_time_utc DESC;
Aggregate by primitive:
SELECT
primitive,
valence,
COUNT(*) as span_count,
AVG(confidence) as avg_confidence,
AVG(intensity) as avg_intensity
FROM pipeline.detected_spans_v2
WHERE business_id = $1
AND created_at >= $2
GROUP BY primitive, valence
ORDER BY span_count DESC;
Configuration
Environment Variables
| Variable | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
OPENAI_API_KEY |
Yes | For LLM classification |
DATABASE_URL |
Yes | PostgreSQL connection |
CLI Options
python run_classification_v2.py [OPTIONS]
Options:
--business TEXT Business name or pattern (required for classify/evaluate)
--limit INT Max reviews to process (default: 100)
--dry-run Don't store results to database
--evaluate BUSINESS Evaluate existing classification quality
--language-analysis Analyze UNMAPPED rates by language across all data
--use-llm Use real LLM classification (default: mock)
--model TEXT Model for LLM (default: gpt-4o-mini)
Models
| Model | Cost | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
gpt-4o-mini |
Low | Default, good balance |
gpt-4o |
High | Complex reviews, higher accuracy |
Evaluation
The classifier includes built-in evaluation to measure quality:
# Evaluate classification quality for a business
python run_classification_v2.py --evaluate "Go Karts Mar Menor"
# Output includes:
# - UNMAPPED rate (target: < 10%)
# - UNMAPPED rate by language
# - Top primitives distribution
# - Contradiction detection (positive text + negative valence)
# - Confidence distribution
Quality Metrics
| Metric | Target | Description |
|---|---|---|
| UNMAPPED rate | < 10% | Content spans that couldn't be classified |
| NON_INFORMATIVE rate | < 30% | Reviews with no actionable content |
| Avg confidence | > 0.7 | Average classifier confidence |
| Contradictions | < 5% | Valence mismatches (e.g., "great" → negative) |
Language Analysis
# Analyze UNMAPPED rates across all languages and sectors
python run_classification_v2.py --language-analysis
# Exclude legacy data (auto/unknown language)
python run_classification_v2.py --language-analysis --ignore-legacy-language
# Only recent data
python run_classification_v2.py --language-analysis --latest-hours 24
Changelog
v2.0 (2026-01)
- New primitives-based taxonomy (MANNER, SPEED, etc.)
- Config resolution from GBP category hierarchy
- Sector-specific enabled primitives and weights
- Language detection with per-language UNMAPPED tracking
- Non-informative detection to skip LLM for junk content
- run_id for tracking classification runs
- Evaluation tooling built-in
v1.0 (Legacy)
- URT code-based classification (J1.01, O1.01)
- Stored in
review_spanstable - Part of original pipeline package